Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Katrina's *Real* Aftermath: Entitlement


Pathetic. At what point, if any, are the government and taxpayers off the hook for 2005's (natural disaster...not man caused) Katrina?

When the upper Midwest was totally flooded recently did those people get to live on the taxpayer dime forever thereafter? Why is it now our responsibility to pay for better lives for these people forever when victims of other disasters get nothing? I don't think that a natural disaster should be a launching board for total government dependence for life for everyone, but its no surprise that *certain* people do. I am happy to see that many of the 30,000 families that were getting "temporary" rental assistance for four years have now stabilized to the point that they no longer qualify. That means they are employed and are taking care of themselves, which means they have dignity and self-respect and they get to feel pride in knowing that they are making it in this crazy world.

What this article showed me was the absolute inability of the government to help people. Look at the examples in the article...private charity has been able to make a difference in peoples' lives when government case workers were not. Three years of government involvement didn’t help, it's only after they are cut off and private charity takes over that these people get the help they need, such as therapy and help navigating the government bureaucracy of applying for disability.

So what did the long-term taxpayer funded aide actually accomplish? Nothing much, people still don't have permanent housing or jobs. People are still getting by in "temporary" situations. What *was* accomplished? A systematic change in thinking from "something bad happened, what can I do to help myself" to "something bad happened, the government caused a hurricane and I want my housing voucher and government check". People are still blaming Bush and demanding financial assistance for life. It boils down to the epic battle between giving a fish and teaching how to fish. The government is great at giving fish but will never teach a man to fish for himself. If all voters could fish for themselves, why would they ever want to vote for a Democrat?

Many of the people hit hardest by Katrina were poverty stricken, homeless and/or had mental illness beforehand. Why is it that the government didn't swoop in before Katrina and give them lifetime support? It's only AFTER the national spotlight caused by a perceived and wholly mistaken accusation that "Bush doesn't care about black people" that they have become adult wards of the taxpayers for life. Thanks Kanye…your publicity stunt worked well. It should come as no surprise that rich Hollywood elites used a natural disaster to attack Bush, when the real responsibility for the craptastic response fell on the shoulders of a black man (Ray Nagin) and a woman (Kathleen Blanco). See, blaming Bush is how liberals celebrate diversity.

Interestingly enough, Kanye West wasn't known for his passion for volunteering in New Orleans soup kitchens before this happened. Think of all the people he could help if he gave 1/10th of his designer clothing and fancy car budget to charity. I guess he doesn't care about poor black people either.

The post-Katrina aide isn't about helping them restart their lives after the disaster, it never has been. It's been years, their lives *have* started over, albeit with better circumstances for many people than they had before the hurricane. If you were one of the thousands of homeless before Katrina, then the hurricane was probably the best thing that could have happened because you now live in a government funded trailer or apartment for life. Let’s face it; a smelly old trailer is better than no smelly old trailer.

There have been PLENTY of disasters in the United States that have displaced people. Nobody can afford to pick of the pieces and start over like this, it's not like the people of New Orleans were different than anyone else in that respect. Why is it that FEMA trailers were temporary in every other disaster, but were literally given to the people living in them three years later? Nope, it's not about righting the wrongs of Mayor Nagin's failed emergency response planning. This is about using the media spot light to give potential voters a reason to shake their heads in disdain at the Bush administration and further the silly stereotype that the GOP is racist and cares more about big business than people. Rehashing this story keeps the headlines from focusing on Michelle Obama's financial schemes to dump poor hospital patients on the street in order to make room for wealthier patients. It distracts the media from the fact that the Democrat created health care plan “forgot” to include *actual reform* in the push to mandate insurance (with punitive threats on the working class), that fills the pockets of the very same rich insurance company CEOs and lobbyists that they villianized to get it passed. Yup-it's the GOP that protects big business at the expense of the little guy....riiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

There should have been an attempt to tell the Katrina SURVIVORS (lets stop using the word "victim", the culture of victimology just breeds entitlement) that the government aide and support wasn't lifetime guaranteed and that they needed to use the support to get on their feet while the city was getting put back together. They should have used the last four years of support to gain skills, find employment and make a better life for themselves. Instead, four years later nothing has changed for some people aside from their belief that they now *deserve* government lifetime support.

At what point do we tell these people to take ownership for their own lives?

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Gotta be honest...

I'm struggling. I haven't been wanting to write recently. I'm uninspired. I've been too busy to sit at my computer for the last few weeks. I'm sorry.

I'll be back soon, I just need to get past the holidays and back to normal life.

In the mean time, check the comment section of the last post for some classy liberal commentary.

Saturday, December 12, 2009

Ambulance Chasing Dems~

I didn't write this but I find it very interesting~

The Democratic Party has become the Lawyers' Party.

* Barack Obama is a lawyer.
* Michelle Obama is a lawyer.
* Hillary Clinton is a lawyer.
* Bill Clinton is a lawyer.
* John Edwards is a lawyer.
* Elizabeth Edwards is a lawyer.

Every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate).
Every Democrat vice presidential nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.
Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress:

* Harry Reid is a lawyer.
* Nancy Pelosi is a lawyer.

The Republican Party is different.

* President Bush is a businessman.
* Vice President Cheney is a businessman.

The leaders of the Republican Revolution:
* Newt Gingrich was a history professor.
*Tom Delay was an exterminator.
* Dick Armey was an economist.
* House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer.
* The former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon.

Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against Ronald Reagan in 1976. The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers.

The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers. Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick, like Frist, or who immerse themselves in history, like Gingrich.

The Lawyers' Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America . And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers' Party, grow.

Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail? Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.

This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers. Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.

Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation. When politicians as lawyers begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming. Some Americans become "adverse parties" of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit. We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.

Today, we are drowning in laws;
we are contorted by judicial decisions;
we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives.

America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked. When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big.

When lawyers use criminal prosecution as a continuation of politics by other means, as happened in the lynching of Scooter Libby and Tom Delay, then the power of lawyers in America is too great. When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

We cannot expect the Lawyers' Party to provide real change, real reform or real hope in America Most Americans know that a republic in which every major government action must be blessed by nine unelected judges is not what Washington intended in 1789. Most Americans grasp that we cannot fight a war when ACLU lawsuits snap at the heels of our defenders. Most Americans intuit that more lawyers and judges will not restore declining moral values or spark the spirit of enterprise in our economy..

Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business. Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work. Perhaps Americans will embrace the truth that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.

The US has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers!

Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as 'spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you' and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits. This legislation has continually been blocked from even being voted on by the Democrat Party. When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association goes to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high!

Monday, December 7, 2009

Exercise for Democrats: Open Mouth-Insert Foot

Really Harry Reid...REALLY?!?! Comparing opponents of a govt takeover of health care (without actual reform) is now akin to "supporting slavery"?!? Don't let history or FACTS get in the way of your usual radical leftist rhetoric Harry. Let me remind you it was the REPUBLICANS that tried to abolish slavery ...despite a Democratic attempt (by Strom Thurmond) to filibuster.

Dems fought FOR slavery you idiot hack. Your poll numbers are on par with your IQ. Don't open your mouth if you don't know your history.

Senator Henry Wilson (R-MA) wrote the DC Emancipation Act in 1862, the Dems fought against it. This law to free the 3,100 slaves in the nation's capital was signed by Republican President Abraham Lincoln. Every SINGLE Democrat in Congress voted against it.

In 1864 Congressional Republicans passed the 13th Amendment unanimously – against nearly unanimous Democrat opposition – and it was ratified within the year.

A few more historic accomplishments you can thank the GOP for Harry Reid though I'm sure you and lots of other uninformed people would assume the Dems did these things.

Now tell me, which party is *REALLY* the party of the people?!? The party that has, for 50+, years created an economic platform aimed at keeping people in poverty and dependent on the government *or* the party chock full of economic policy that supports equality, people and business-which is the only reason the majority of the people in this country have jobs. The party that inherited and ended the worst recession since the Great Depression inside of 18 months *or* the party that spent us to near bankruptcy with the promise of job creation, yet drove us up to close to 20% unemployment and only managed to create czar jobs.

Try as you might Mr. Reid, you & Obama can't have every American working in a government job or as a Czar, and poor people don't hire....so maybe be a little less harsh on the GOP when you hurl WRONG information in an attempt to villianize us. Were the reason many of your voters have jobs. You're welcome Harry.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Joy Behar Opens her Black Hole of a Mouth Again...



Yes Joy, "Black Friday" is racist...

Just like blackbirds, black labs, black hair, Black Sabbath, the color black, black holes,
and black cats. To liberal fanatics like yourself, anything and everything that uses the word black is obviously racist.

I'm off to eat a racist meal of black berries, black eyed peas, blackened chicken and black licorice.